Hi Guillaume, Am Montag, den 16.09.2019, 06:53 +0000 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andreas Färber <[email protected]> > > Sent: 15 September 2019 20:47 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [opensuse-arm] New Tumbleweed snapshot 20190907 > > released! - > > corosync > > > > Am 13.09.19 um 15:04 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: > > > Packages changed: > > [...] > > > busybox > > > ceph (14.2.2.348+gf6da3d1d18 -> 14.2.2.354+g8878cf2360) > > > cronie > > > dhcp > > [snip] > > > > In my upgrade from 20190814 I also saw this, missing from above > > list: > > > > (252/276) Installieren: corosync-2.4.5-2.1.aarch64 > > .....................[fertig] > > I guess corosync is not on the DVD. As stated on the header: > The described changes are computed based on the aarch64 DVD. The full > online repo contains too many changes to be listed here.
I don't mind whether it's in a list or not. The implied question is, are you or anyone aware of the below errors this package generates (on a JeOS-raspberrypi3 image) and is there already a Bugzilla tracking it? You didn't mention any known issue - this threads seems the perfect place to collect them per snapshot. > > Zusätzliche rpm-Ausgabe: > > Updating /etc/sysconfig/corosync ... > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LTra7O: line 67: [: -eq: unary operator expected > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LTra7O: line 71: [: -gt: unary operator expected I don't knowingly use this package and certainly didn't touch its config, so this looks scary! I wonder how it passed openQA - maybe because it's "not on the DVD" and the tests need to be expanded? Or does zypper not make such rpm scriplet errors available to the caller and needs to be amended? Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 247165 (AG München) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
