Hi Andreas, > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Färber <[email protected]> > Sent: 16 September 2019 13:35 > To: Guillaume Gardet <[email protected]>; opensuse- > [email protected] > Cc: nd <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [opensuse-arm] New Tumbleweed snapshot 20190907 released! - > corosync > > Hi Guillaume, > > Am Montag, den 16.09.2019, 06:53 +0000 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andreas Färber <[email protected]> > > > Sent: 15 September 2019 20:47 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [opensuse-arm] New Tumbleweed snapshot 20190907 > > > released! - corosync > > > > > > Am 13.09.19 um 15:04 schrieb Guillaume Gardet: > > > > Packages changed: > > > [...] > > > > busybox > > > > ceph (14.2.2.348+gf6da3d1d18 -> 14.2.2.354+g8878cf2360) > > > > cronie > > > > dhcp > > > [snip] > > > > > > In my upgrade from 20190814 I also saw this, missing from above > > > list: > > > > > > (252/276) Installieren: corosync-2.4.5-2.1.aarch64 > > > .....................[fertig] > > > > I guess corosync is not on the DVD. As stated on the header: > > The described changes are computed based on the aarch64 DVD. The full > > online repo contains too many changes to be listed here. > > I don't mind whether it's in a list or not. The implied question is, are you > or > anyone aware of the below errors this package generates (on a JeOS- > raspberrypi3 image) and is there already a Bugzilla tracking it?
I am not aware of any existing Bugzilla for this one. > You didn't mention any known issue - this threads seems the perfect place to > collect them per snapshot. It could be as long as people also fill bugs on Bugzilla. > > > > Zusätzliche rpm-Ausgabe: > > > Updating /etc/sysconfig/corosync ... > > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LTra7O: line 67: [: -eq: unary operator expected > > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LTra7O: line 71: [: -gt: unary operator expected > > I don't knowingly use this package and certainly didn't touch its config, so > this > looks scary! I wonder how it passed openQA - maybe because it's "not on the > DVD" and the tests need to be expanded? Or does zypper not make such rpm > scriplet errors available to the caller and needs to be amended? Zypper output is checked, so it does not appear on a system installed from the DVD or NET install. We do not test `zypper dup` from previous Tumbleweed JeOS, only from previous Tumbleweed Gnome. It is probably a good idea to add this to openQA. I created a ticket to track this: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/56936 Thanks, Guillaume > > Thanks, > Andreas > > -- > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer > HRB 247165 (AG München)
