On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:23:41 CET Adrian Schröter wrote: > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter <[email protected]>: > > > > > > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that > > > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the > > > > > > following > > > > > > platforms: > > > > > > > > > > > > aarch64 > > > > > > armv6l > > > > > > i586 > > > > > > ppc64le > > > > > > x86_64 > > > > > > > > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back? > > > > > > > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is > > > > > overwriting armv7hl :/ > > > > > > > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a > > > > > solution. > > > > > > > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to > > > > > publish armv6l in a > > > > > different repository. > > > > > > > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here? > > > > > > > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are > > > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7 > > > > > > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my > > > proposal as well. > > > > No, I mean docker platform names. Look here: > > > > https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/ > > > > Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform: > > linux/arm/v7" for armv7. > > Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry? > > I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform > string > is stored there. It should look like > > "platform" : { > "architecture" : "amd64", > "os" : "linux" > } > > but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"... > > They may (mis)use the version string for this?
ah, "variant" might be a way to go ... anyway, would be great if you find a real life example out there... -- Adrian Schroeter <[email protected]> Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
