чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:27, Adrian Schröter <[email protected]>:
>
> On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:17:49 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:15, Adrian Schröter <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 09:13:24 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 11:12, Adrian Schröter <[email protected]>:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2020, 18:07:56 CET Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here (https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview ) I see that
> > > > > > opensuse/tubmleweed multiplatform docker image supports the
> > > > > > following
> > > > > > platforms:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aarch64
> > > > > > armv6l
> > > > > > i586
> > > > > > ppc64le
> > > > > > x86_64
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, armv7l is missed for some reason. How could we get it back?
> > > > >
> > > > > The docker registry only knows "arm" and "arm64". So armv6l is
> > > > > overwriting armv7hl :/
> > > > >
> > > > > Guillaume and me decided to unpublish armv6l for now until we found a
> > > > > solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > Renaming the image is bad for references, so I guess we need to
> > > > > publish armv6l in a
> > > > > different repository.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fabian, do you have an opinion here?
> > > >
> > > > I remember, that once I saw that correct docker platform names are
> > > > linux/arm/v6 and linux/arm/v7
> > >
> > > you mean having it in a different repository? yes, that was my
> > > proposal as well.
> >
> > No, I mean docker platform names. Look here:
> >
> > https://www.docker.com/blog/getting-started-with-docker-for-arm-on-linux/
> >
> > Docker people use "Platform: linux/arm64" for aarch64 and "Platform:
> > linux/arm/v7" for armv7.
>
> Hm, can you find a real life example in any registry?
>
> docker run mplatform/mquery postgres
Image: postgres
* Manifest List: Yes
* Supported platforms:
- linux/amd64
- linux/arm/v5
- linux/arm/v7
- linux/arm64
- linux/386
- linux/ppc64le
- linux/s390x
> docker run mplatform/mquery ubuntu
Image: ubuntu
* Manifest List: Yes
* Supported platforms:
- linux/amd64
- linux/arm/v7
- linux/arm64
- linux/386
- linux/ppc64le
- linux/s390x
> I like to look at the manifest, because I have no clue atm how this platform
> string
> is stored there. It should look like
>
> "platform" : {
> "architecture" : "amd64",
> "os" : "linux"
> }
>
> but architecture is limited to "Go" architectures which only knows "arm"...
>
> They may (mis)use the version string for this?
>
> Maybe an option...
>
> --
>
> Adrian Schroeter <[email protected]>
> Build Infrastructure Project Manager
>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
> (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>
>
>
>
--
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
