Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Jens Siebert wrote: > >> Want to know what I've done while going on with this senseless >> discussion? > > Thou shalt. > > You have requested a feature here (you know - additional work from other > people), talking about errors without exactly showing the errors.
I requested WHAT? Doesn't anybody READ anymore? Read again please: --snip-- Hi there, does anybody know of a compatibility package of gcc version 3.x for Suse 10.x ? I've looked into the opensuse repositories but only found a compat-g77 package. Is there something similar for the C compiler? I need this for an older program which doesn't compile with gcc 4.x. --snap-- Does this sound like a request to you? Do you read "I request a gcc 3.x package immediately" out of this? If yes, then read it again and again until you understand that this was a simple question which could have been answered by a simple "yes" or "no" or by simply ignoring it. Or by simply saying: "No, there isn't a package so you have to compile one for yourself". Or whatever! Details were totally uninteresting in this case. But it seems that some people need to bash around without reason on everything that possibly could come from a newbie because it sounds simple. > > The usual penalty for that is 101% ignorance, so please feel good now or > eat the big letters. Yeah sure... Ignorance is bliss... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
