On 27 Apr 2006 at 10:41, Marcus Meissner wrote:

> We can't rev the version if we don't include all the fixes and some
> might just be too dangerous.

Yes, but you also cannot not rev the version if not no (=some, not all) fixes 
were 
included. That's the original issue I think. Maybe the question is whether "can 
not" can be replaces with "should not" or "may not" ;-) Sorry for this kind 
comment...

Regards,
Ulrich


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to