Dňa Ut 30. Máj 2006 10:57 Pascal Bleser napísal:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >> One question we have is how the new tools rug, zen-updater and zmd
> >> compare to what we had before with YaST Online Update and
> >> suseWatcher. We are interested in every feedback ranging from
> >> architecture, design or used standards and their enhancements.
> >
> > It should be possible to disable and remove the whole ZMD stuff
> > and still be able to work from commandline.
>
> Indeed.
> rug is hardwired to ZMD though, AFAIK.
>
> What's the added value of ZMD on 10.1, given that the resolver engine
> is in zypp anyway ?
>
> The only advantage of having ZMD is to be able to manage SL 10.1
> instances from Zenworks (for which you have to buy licenses from
> Novell). Or is there anything else ?
>
> If that's the only real advantage, I consider it a pretty high price
> to pay, because it's a rather useless daemon running on the system.
> At the very least, it should be optional (and turned off on every SL
> installation when you didn't buy Zenworks).
>
> Though another point is that rug mandates ZMD.
> Unfortunately rug is the only CLI tool to install packages on 10.1
> (well, there's y2pmsh, which works but... it's the old engine ;)).
>
>
> Other question: is there any particular reason for yast2 to use zypp
> directly instead of talking to ZMD [1] ?
>
> [1]http://files.opensuse.org/opensuse/en/7/78/Package-management-in-code10.
>png
>
> IMHO, it looks like either
> a) it's a hack
> b) it's necessary because there's no way to have yast2 talk to ZMD
> because ZMD is implemented with Mono
> c) both ;)

No, see Duncan's post and mine: ZMD is optional component and YaST needs a way 
to install packages in a restricted environment during the installation.

Stano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to