Marcus, Juan, On Monday 06 November 2006 07:52, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > On 2006-11-06 07:44:53 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > On Monday 06 November 2006 07:38, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > > > just for the logic: > > > ext3 - obsolete > > > > Are you serious? You really believe ext3 is obsolete? That seems > > odd, given how widely used it is. Even FAT is not obsolete and it's > > archaic. Perhaps you mean "obsolescent?" I.e., in the process of > > becoming obsolete but not yet there. > > > > Anyway, could you clarify this statement? > > i just quoted the author of the other mail. > he stated that ext3 is obsolete, so i wonder what one should use > than.
Sorry. I misunderstood the quoting. I see it is Juan Erbes to whom my comments / questions are directed. Juan? > darix Randall Schulz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
