On Friday 24 November 2006 15:15, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Hugo Costelha wrote: > > It seems wuite intuitive to me. I also prefer longer names, if they are > > easier to remember and much easier to get some sense out of them, which I > > think is the case here. > > It does not take longer time to get a sense for a shorter word. > But directory listings have a chance to be readable and submitting URLs > has a chance not to get broken if the path names are short. >
I am talking of my experience, and for me it takes. But maybe it is just for me. > the length of > > /pub/opensuse/distribution/openSUSE-10.2/repositories/source-non-oss/ > > already is really crazy and a pain for everyone who needs to spell or > type it - a full line already, and still missing protocol prefix, > hostname, arch suffix and filename. > > /pub/suse/i386/9.3/ was a good path naming and length. Well, one thing with be to remove openSUSE, ant it would be http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/10.2/repositories/oss Looks small enough to me! Hugo Costelha --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
