>>> Reply on 04-12-2006 17:48:20 <<<
> On Monday 04 December 2006 07:34, M9 wrote: > > Randall R Schulz schreef: > > > ... > > > > > > I certainly have never seen that site before, nor do I have even > > > the slightest interest in what is purveyed there. The name is > > > enough to signal its purpose. > > > > So i guess we will have to call you st. randall now eh? > > I'm far from the typical sex-negative, puritanical American. I just > don't go for children. > > Now I think you're exageraging a lot! The site that was visible on his screenshot was talking about teen and you just offend him of being after children? Maybe he just turned twenty, then it's normal to be affected by this age. On the other hand, if you're 50, it's less likely... but accusing him of being after children is plain unfair and rough! Dominique --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
