-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Thursday 2007-09-20 at 19:37 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:

> Additional safety of more disks unless using RAID is an illusion, and then
> with RAID you're right back to the limit of 14. To get 28 and safety means
> you need 4 disks: 2 for each set of 14 partitions, and matching devices for
> the RAID1. Now with 4 disks you have 4 times the opportunity for hardware
> failure, and 4 times the cost.

I think we might do something: use two disks in software raid 
configuration. Perhaps some non raid partitions (/boot?), then a big raid 
partition having the rest of the disk. This would appear as /dev/md0.

Now, md0 can be partitioned. From 
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/devices.txt:

  9 block       Metadisk (RAID) devices
                  0 = /dev/md0          First metadisk group
                  1 = /dev/md1          Second metadisk group
                    ...

Here, the minor represents the device. I'm not sure how would partitions 
inside appear. I know it can be partitioned because fdisk says so:


] nimrodel:~ # fdisk /dev/md0
] Device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, SGI or OSF 
disklabel
] Building a new DOS disklabel. Changes will remain in memory only,
] until you decide to write them. After that, of course, the previous
] content won't be recoverable.
]
]
] The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 781136.
] There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
] and could in certain setups cause problems with:
] 1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO)
] 2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs
]    (e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)
] Warning: invalid flag 0x0000 of partition table 4 will be corrected by w(rite)


I haven't tried it, not further that point. It is not ideal, of course, 
but... :-?  might work?

Of course, you can use a degraded raid of only one side, ie, one disk.


> 30 takes 3 devices, because 15 is only the name of the last device, not the
> count, which is 14, because on sd[1-4] only 3 can have filesystems.

Ouch. I hadn't noticed that "detail". We usually don't count the extended 
partition. Of course, we can only use partition 1..15, of which one of 
them is not writeable.

- -- 
Cheers,
       Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFG8w58tTMYHG2NR9URAj9AAKCAMDcF4F9h1rv2nzfz8tFbEXGdpACbBZzh
+6JLKaa26Xl+NS/mTcusVQQ=
=WYf0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to