On Thursday, February 17, 2011 08:27:30 PM Rajko M. wrote: > On Thursday, February 17, 2011 03:10:51 pm Helen South wrote: > > With all the noteworthy suggestions about campaigns built around a > > > > > chameleon changing color, wouldn't that run afoul of the official > > > restrictions displaying the openSUSE geeko? > > > > > > I recently read this which seems to me if strictly followed frowns on > > > such shenanigans... > > > > > > http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Artwork_brand > > > > > > Tony > > > -- > > > > We're not talking about color changing the logo itself though - just a > > related chameleon character. > > > > Helen > > Helen, Tony > > One thing is official logo that is strictly defined. > http://en.opensuse.org/images/0/0e/Opensuse-spacing-preview.png > > The other thing is what we can do to create derivatives. > All derivatives are not openSUSE logos, just artistic play on the logo > subject. > > Under "improper logo use": > http://en.opensuse.org/File:Opensuse-donts-preview.png > you can see examples of logos that are similar to official, but can't be > considered as official. >
> BTW, even the logo on http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Artwork_brand is not > really official :) > oh, God, I always thought this was official. :-( > Here is what is protected as a trademark: > http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4003:qpkc5l.2.1 This last link returns "This search session has expired. Please start a search session again by clicking on the TRADEMARK icon, if you wish to continue" -- Ricardo Chung | openSUSE Linux Ambassador Panama Testing version:| oS 11.4 Milestone 6 | KDE 4.6.00 | Mesa-Nouveau 3D -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
