Will Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Karl Eichwalder said:
>> What does this mean? Do yout think it is better to add the version
>> number to the name of the library subpackage?
>
> Yes, that's the idea. http://en.opensuse.org/Shared_Library_Packaging_Policy
> explains it. It takes a few readings for it all to sink in.
Thanks for both your help. The package is now ready to be checked in.
%{name} is not understood by all checker scripts (I now expanded it on
my own):
updating package descriptions from db (malaga lib%{name}7-devel lib%{name}7)
ERROR: package not found
ERROR: package not found
...done
malaga: checking descriptions ...ok, checking license ...ok
lib%{name}7-devel: checking descriptions ...EMPTY, checking license
Package lib%{name}7-devel does not seem to have a license entered
in the package database.
lib%{name}7: checking descriptions ...EMPTY, checking license
Package lib%{name}7 does not seem to have a license entered
in the package database.
--
Karl Eichwalder
R&D / Documentation
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
