On Friday 01 June 2007 09:34:39 Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > on Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > There are new, considered to be experimental, checks for rpmlint > > diagnostics in Factory. So far, the following checks are enabled: > > > > arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share 590 > > infopage-not-gzipped 540 > > wrong-script-interpreter 533 > > arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object 499 > > library-without-ldconfig-postun 400 > > shlib-with-non-pic-code 223 > > files-duplicated-waste 100 > > summary-not-capitalized 63 > > spurious-executable-perm 50 > > devel-file-in-non-devel-package 50 > > wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding 1 > > Can you add some explanation what these checks do? (code is also OK) > > I'm especially interested in spurious-executable-perm, but some of the > others aren't self-explaining also. > > > Regards, > > Christian Boltz
Hi Christian. See http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint#spurious-executable-perm Perhaps at the end of a build with rpmlint warnings or errors, a the reference to http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint should be given as I think a lot of people will ask about rpmlint errors. Best, Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
