On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 at 12:00, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> You wouldn't be able to install the package without breaking
> dependencies. That's annoying at least.
Right, but that wouldn't matter from a legal point of view. If a
license requires us to include the license text with the binary
package, we might break the license no matter how hard we make it to
install the package without the license file being installed as well.
GPLv2 says (section 1.) "[...] and give any other recipients of the
Program a copy of this License along with the Program." So, is setting
a symlink to a file and adding a dependency to the package enough to
fulfill the "along with the Program" requirement?
cu
Reinhard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
