* Reinhard Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 12:36]: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 at 12:00, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > > > You wouldn't be able to install the package without breaking > > dependencies. That's annoying at least. > > Right, but that wouldn't matter from a legal point of view. If a > license requires us to include the license text with the binary > package, we might break the license no matter how hard we make it to > install the package without the license file being installed as well. > > GPLv2 says (section 1.) "[...] and give any other recipients of the > Program a copy of this License along with the Program." So, is setting > a symlink to a file and adding a dependency to the package enough to > fulfill the "along with the Program" requirement?
Why not ask our legals? :) Thanks, Bernhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
