On Thu, Nov 05, PGNet Dev wrote:
> For other Leap repos being activated, the naming convention appears to be:
>
> .../openSUSE_Leap_42.1
>
> (1) Should the Virtualization repo be similarly named?
The repository of non-home:* repos have various names:
125 openSUSE_Leap_42.1
37 openSUSE_42.1
8 openSUSE_42
1 openSUSE_Leap_42_1
1 openSUSE_Leap_42.1_PowerPC
1 openSUSE_Leap_42.1_Ports
> (2) Can whatever the correctly-named repo is to be get activated/populated?
Yes.
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
