I saw this for Tcl as well. I thought Leap was a kind of working name like all openSUSE release have. And that it was just the number that should be used, as in previous releases. At least it should be consistent. I suspect the problem with standardizing and being consistent (with Linux, you say? ;) ) is all the stuff in OBS that use Leap in the name.
Anyway, what is the official name things should be known as in OBS? Shouldn't it be only: openSUSE_42.1 On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Olaf Hering <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, PGNet Dev wrote: > >> For other Leap repos being activated, the naming convention appears to be: >> >> .../openSUSE_Leap_42.1 >> >> (1) Should the Virtualization repo be similarly named? > > The repository of non-home:* repos have various names: > > 125 openSUSE_Leap_42.1 > 37 openSUSE_42.1 > 8 openSUSE_42 > 1 openSUSE_Leap_42_1 > 1 openSUSE_Leap_42.1_PowerPC > 1 openSUSE_Leap_42.1_Ports > >> (2) Can whatever the correctly-named repo is to be get activated/populated? > > Yes. > > Olaf > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Roger Oberholtzer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
