Hi,
On Tuesday, September 06, 2005 at 15:27:57, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:48:31PM +0200, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
> > You can even have more criteria:
> >
> > - submitted for the first time
> > - downloaded N times from download.opensuse.org
> > - installed N times on SUSE Linux (would need some "opt in" monitoring app)
>
> - list all reported bugs concerning this package
>
> - number of bugs submitted
>
> - number of bugs resolved
>
> - number of bugs pending
>
> - what other users think of this package
>
> - the package is 10 (high quality) .. 0 (bad quality)
>
> - comments on the package
>
> Actually you finally should not decide on such numbers whether you install a
> package but find out to whom packager you can trust or even to whom person can
> you trust if he tells you that you can trust to a specific packager.
Only if you want to be dead sure of course. If you want to handle that a
bit more sloppy then you can just rely on the numb3rs. And numb3rs
shouldnt be everything here. Like you said comments are also a very good
way to check the quality. Or we bring trust-rings into play. I trust
Pascal. You trust me. So you trust Pascal also.
There are so many ways to cherry pick for quality.....
Henne
--
Henne Vogelsang, Subsystems
"Rules change. The Game remains the same."
- Omar (The Wire)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
