On 9/19/2005 9:14 AM Pascal Bleser wrote: > houghi wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:01:30AM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > ... >>> Great. As you know something that is installed via a non-official repo >>> will become locked. This causes it to be excluded from newer versions, >>> wich might be importand in case of security patches. >>> Would this also be handled? > > That needs to be adressed by the YaST2 developers. > If you use apt or redcarpet, those packages are not "locked", and they may > not be. > It's a broken approach.
I think some susers take care of this by adding a build-Number with 0.xyz cause every "official" package that suse releases has a 0 there, so it is overwritten by the suse package. Just a workaround as far as I see. OJ -- "Have you ever noticed that the Klingons are all speaking unix? 'Grep ls awk chmod.'' 'Mknod ksh tar imap.' 'Wall fsck yacc!' (that last is obviously a curse of some sort)." Gandalf Parker
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
