Shriramana Sharma wrote: > Just a question of curiosity - why would that be?
Good question! I also wondered why the difference was _that_ big. Here are my thoughts, copied from the website: "My personal guess is that this is because ReiserFS needs lots of CPU time (at least that's what I heard). This doesn't matter in your normal "copy lots of files" benchmark, since in those scenarios the CPU is almost idle. However, when you boot a system, the CPU is not idle but has lots of stuff to do, which might slow down a CPU intensive file system. Note however, that this is just my personal guess." Cheers nordi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
