On Monday 10 October 2005 3:31 am, nordi wrote: > Shriramana Sharma wrote: > > Well you know what they say - your mileage may vary. Nordi's test meant > > that for him ext3 was faster. Now maybe I've missed some mails in this > > thread but until someone else has confirmed Nordi's on a widely different > > configuration of a PC, one cannot conclude that the problem is with > > reiserfs. > > Exactly! That's also the reason why I'd like other people to make > benchmarks of unmodified ReiserFS vs unmodified Ext3. The only other PC > I have available for testing is a K6-2 300Mhz, and that would certainly > not be representative for your average Suse PC.
I have a pentium III 600 i'll test it on. Again, not a 'typical' pc, but at least it's something. Kirk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
