Monday, 23 January 2006 19:11 samaye, Christoph Thiel alekhiit: > open source licenses that aren't listed there. The The Artistic License > (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php) would be OK of > course.
Would the Revised Artistic Licence: http://dev.perl.org/perl6/rfc/346.html be okay? The page says: The Artistic License is updated to "The Artistic License, Version 2.0" (or, "Artistic-2.0" for short). This license tries to fit the spirit of the original Artistic License, while keeping the text of the license clear, and legally sound, and address the issues set forth in RFC211. A discussion of how "Artistic-2.0" compares with the original Artistic License, and with other proposals are available in the [email protected] mailing list archives. -- Penguin #395953 resides at http://samvit.org subsisting on SUSE Linux 10.0 with KDE 3.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
