On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 01:27:32AM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > > I had claimed this inconsistency (the "harsh" word) as "<something> is > newer" 48 hours before, with no reply and no reaction. > > It is a quality management failure, even if it should have been there > already at Hubert's time, and it is addressed now. > It was already addressed 48 hours before, but I guess exactly those people > who are claiming "too harsh" now had not enough sensitivity for the first > notice.
So you reported that saturday morning, half past one. Seems like the weekend shift was on strike or something. Rasmus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
