On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 10:15 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Rasmus Plewe wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 01:27:32AM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > > >> I had claimed this inconsistency (the "harsh" word) as "<something> is > >> newer" 48 hours before, with no reply and no reaction. > >> > >> It is a quality management failure, even if it should have been there > >> already at Hubert's time, and it is addressed now. > >> It was already addressed 48 hours before, but I guess exactly those people > >> who are claiming "too harsh" now had not enough sensitivity for the first > >> notice. > > > > So you reported that saturday morning, half past one. Seems like the > > weekend shift was on strike or something. > > Yes, there was something happening which was not detected by the scripts. > A quality management issue. > > Cheers -e
Ok, please again: can you stop this bullshit ? get a life, get a final version ... if you try a beta version, create good bugreports ... and don't start complete threads with only wining etc. 10.0 is a very good distro, and 10.1 will be even better, that it will be better, it's thanks to all the good developers, bugreporters etc. not because people like you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
