On Tuesday 07 February 2006 02:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Each individual looking at a bugreport might misjudge it - or see it
> differently than you. With the number of bugreports this can happen
> quite often, so please don't feel offended. If you disagree, you can
> reopen it yourself or ask me about it as an escalation (hope this
> does not happen too often ;-). I reopened this particular bug now
> and assigned it on,
I have a similar situation with 146060: I've been unable to install
beta2 or beta3 on several machines with these same symptoms, but I
can't tell from the bug report if it's invalid, wontfix, etc. because
there are no comments added to it. I raised it to P2/blocker and added
a vote after I found that I couldn't use beta3 either.
This would be a showstopper for us in the shop I work at, where we would
have to cancel our plans to deploy 10.1 on several servers and find a
different distro instead :(
--
======================================================
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
======================================================
"Greater coherence cannot be achieved. Not even the
Netherlanders have managed this." -Anton Webern
======================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
