On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 February 2006 02:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Each individual looking at a bugreport might misjudge it - or see it
> > differently than you. With the number of bugreports this can happen
> > quite often, so please don't feel offended. If you disagree, you can
> > reopen it yourself or ask me about it as an escalation (hope this
> > does not happen too often ;-). I reopened this particular bug now
> > and assigned it on,
>
> I have a similar situation with 146060: I've been unable to install
> beta2 or beta3 on several machines with these same symptoms, but I
> can't tell from the bug report if it's invalid, wontfix, etc. because
> there are no comments added to it. I raised it to P2/blocker and added
> a vote after I found that I couldn't use beta3 either.
>
> This would be a showstopper for us in the shop I work at, where we would
> have to cancel our plans to deploy 10.1 on several servers and find a
> different distro instead :(
Known blocker (should be fixed for beta4) with XFS: Check out #145204...
Regards
Christoph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
