Hello, On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, houghi wrote: >On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 06:23:46PM +0100, David Haller wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, houghi wrote: >> >Do you have a link to a posting and how it looks? >> >> http://lists.suse.com/archives/suse-linux/2003-Aug/0402.html >> >> Note that my site is temporarily unavailable. > >Thanks. I personaly see no use for this on the mailing list.
I'm undecided ;) FWIW, the stats seem to have some kind of merit. >> >It would be interested >> >to see how quoality posting is measured. Qantity posting is something I am >> >very much against. Especially because people might start posting just to >> >be in the top 100. That would be posting for the wrong reason. >> >> Quality is not measured. How could one? > >Misread it. I understood that there was some kind of measuring already >going on. No. Except the correlations you can do, given the few datapoints available (possibly aided by stats: number of posts, quoting-ratio, etc.). Give me a means to measure quality of mails, and I'm a happy bunny! I guess that'd make SpamAssassin obsolete as well... -dnh -- "Ich darf Ihnen von ganzem Herzen gratulieren: Sie haben den mit weitem Abstand höchsten Grad an Freiheit im Umgang mit der Wahrheit erreicht, den ich jemals an einem Menschen beobachten durfte". -- Volker Gringmuth --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
