Hello All, I see this item: CDB/HCL - hardware database efforts
--the_dude (?) didnt happen on 2006-02-07 - but it shouldn't be forgotten ;-) On: http://en.opensuse.org/2006-03-07-status-meeting Can someone please enlighten this? Is it related to a hardware database of beta testers? Regards, Joop. On Thu, March 2, 2006 11:29 pm, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > I just put some points to the agenda of the > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-03-07-status-meeting > > I also checked the old meeting minutes for open action items. Here's > what seems to be still open (I added some comments in "[...]"): > > > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-01-24-status-meeting > > Mailinglists: > Action Item skh, henne: [on hold till after 10.1 launch] > - Prepare and announcement for list migration to the internal SUSE > lists. > - risk assesment for the internal packagers list. > Action Item adrian: > - check again with IS&T about searchable archives. [nearly running] > > FOSDEM: > Action Item cthiel, pascal: > - evaluate our FOSDEM participation after FOSDEM > > Build Service: > Action Item everybody: > - Discuss Trust/Rating system at FOSDEM > > > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-02-07-status-meeting > > Mirrors > Action Item henne: > - Discuss mirror situation in [email protected] [ongoing/done?] > - Involve [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the discussion > Action Item schiele: [2006-02-21: Discuss this at FOSDEM] > - discuss how we can make the drpmsync service better > - help in the documentation process, extending > http://en.opensuse.org/How_to_setup_a_drpmsync_server > Action Item notlocalhorst: > - upload final 10.1 torrents to the wiki [just for the records, can't > be done yet obviously ;-) ] > > opensuse.org frontpage redesign > Action Item michl: > - discuss front page redesign on opensuse-wiki > > Forum discussion > Action Item Viras: > - take the discussion to the forum people in suselinuxsupport.de forum > Action item skh: > - talk to suse internal people to see about resources, etc if the forum > idea goes ok > Action Item StormX: > - invite the other forum maintainers to the suselinuxsupport.de > opensuse-forum category > > subfs discussion > Action Item henne: > - write SDB article about alternatives of subfs > [ > -> http://en.opensuse.org/2006-02-21-status-meeting > Action item skh > - Add to the task force page > ] > > LinuxTag > [not an action item, but open questions:] > - status of community booth? > - really no "commercial" Novell booth? > > SDB migration to wiki > Action Item notlocalhorst: > - write HOWTO style-guide [2006-02-21: ongoing] > - communicate that we want to keep SDB clean of HOWTO like writings > [2006-02-21: unclear] > > 10.1 status > Action Item notlocalhorst: [+ garloff] > - write documentation about the end user part of the KMP switch > > > http://en.opensuse.org/2006-02-21-status-meeting > > Status 10.1 > Action Item AJaeger > - add info about all the small YaST tools to the libzypp Wiki page > Action Item skh / AJaeger > - explain "Feature Freeze" on Factory and write something about the > development model to Factory > > Status mailinglists > Action Item henne/Klaus > - find out if we can help heiko with the postfix rewrites for the new > list server > [additionally, a short status update would be a good idea] > > Creation of a Community Task from Meetings > Action Item skh > - create the Tasks Wiki page > Action Item darix > - take care of Bugzilla->Wiki piping for that page > > Wiki > old Action Item henne: > - Rework download page to match the new media layout > -> Action item skh > - Put on the task page > old Action item michl: > - Discuss front page redesign on opensuse-wiki > -> Action item shk > - Put on the task page > > > I hope I did not miss anything and also didn't list things that are done > already ;-) - feel free to correct me. > > > > While doing this list, I thought about a wiki page to manage open > "action items" which could be a good method to avoid that things are > forgotten. > > Proposed handling: > - create a page "open action items" > - after every meeting, collect all action items on that page > (yes, that duplicates that information. But on the other hand, it > avoids that you have to scan all meeting minutes - it needs more time, > trust me ;-) > - when an item is done, simply remove it from the "open action items" > page (or: mark them as done, remove them two weeks later after the > next meeting) > > Do you think this would be a good idea? If yes, I will create the "Open > Action Items" page and add the listed items there. > > > Regards, > > Christian Boltz > -- >>... Bücher sind ein grässliches Medium ... > Ich schätze daran die leichte Portierbarkeit vom Sofa ins Bett. > [Bjoern Hoehrmann und Peter Bieling in dciwam] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
