Hello, Am Freitag, 3. März 2006 11:20 schrieb Henne Vogelsang: > On Thursday, March 02, 2006 at 23:29:51, Christian Boltz wrote: > > I also checked the old meeting minutes for open action items. > > [...] > > While doing this list, I thought about a wiki page to manage open > > "action items" which could be a good method to avoid that things > > are forgotten. > > Im strongly against it. I would rather do that in bugzilla, we have a > "product" openSUSE and we just need a "Action Item" component. A wiki > page can be a nice output from a parsed bugzilla but for handling > action items it sucks big time.
OK, this sounds even better. Now as you mention it: I already read this in the 2006-02-21 transscript - but it seems it got lost when the meeting minutes were written. I just added it ;-) When can we expect the bugzilla "Action Item" component available? ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Verstehen kann ich das Problem. Die meisten von uns hätten gerne brandaktuelle *und* felsenstabile Software. Der Unterschied zwischen Redmond und Pinguinhausen ist, daß erstere dir erzählen, daß man beides haben könne. Stimmt aber nicht. [Ratti in suse-linux] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
