Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:05:58PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 
>> > Seems that you only fixed the issue but not the cause of the issue.  Now we
>> > have ant-antlr-1.6.5-17.i586 but ant-1.6.5-16.noarch.
>> 
>> Is that a problem as well ? ;-(
>
> $ rpm -qpR ant-antlr-1.6.5-17.i586.rpm
> ant = 1.6.5-17
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadIsBzip2) <= 3.0.5-1
> $ 
>
>> Oh shit :-(
>
> Some of your colleagues claimed that you have a script that automatically does
> such dependency checks.  Either they all lied at me or you should actually
> start using this script.

Most of them are at Linux Tag right now ;-(.

Have you noticed any other broken dependicies?
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgpJM29TW5DgV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to