On Saturday 11 November 2006 23:21, M Harris wrote:
> On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:24, you wrote:
> > Re: software patentability:
> > I ask this in all seriousness; I don't have a particular pre-conceived
> > bias one way or the other:
> >
> > Why would assembling a collections of "objects" (as in C-objects)
> > together to perform some function be any different that assembling a
> > collection of resistors, capacitors and active devices together to form
> > a "circuit" (which is certainly patentable)?
>
>      hi Tony,
>
>      Great question. I asked it also, as I was thinking through this...
>
>      The answer is simple, but in order to answer it you need to ask
> another question.... how is "software" like or unlike a collection of
> resistors and capacitors assembled on a circuit board... compare and
> contrast.
>
>      The circuit board containing resistors and capacitors is a physical
> (meta-physical) construction comprised of real objects manufactured from
> "stuff" that we generally call matter (we can touch it). Software is text.
>
>      The point is that software (as a medium) is only text, like a play, a
> novel, a short story, a poem... or a recipe in a cookbook. It is a set of
> symbols which can be read (by another person, or by a machine)....  it is
> text, plain and simple.
>
>      Text is protected by copyright (or copyleft... as I see it) and is not
> patentable. Software is text, and as such should be protected by copyright
> (or copyleft) and should not be patentable any more than a recipe in a
> cookbook (designed to be read and "executed" by a chef in a kitchen). The
> recipe in the cookbook, and any other software objects, are both text....
> protected by copyright perhaps (or copyleft) but not patentable.
>
/snip/

You should be happy that software is patented, rather than copyrighted.  
Patents expire within a long but reasonable(?) time;  copyrights don't expire
for almost 200 years.  No-one living will ever see a copyright expire, even
if it was granted to Mickey Mouse movies of the 1920's.

Of course, I'm not happy that software is patented, I think that's ridiculous,
but think of the alternative!

--doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to