On 2006-11-12 10:55, Duncan Mac-Vicar wrote:
> On Sunday 12 November 2006 13:21, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>> Just about when 10.1 was released a thought came to me that I wanted to
>> share: Why was 10.1 delayed? Not because the package management system
>> was not working ('just another bug'),
>>
>
> Your theory fails becauseyou start wrong assumptions.
>
> Do you consideer package management "just another bug"?
> When it was changed, basically what broke was:
Clearly, though, release was not delayed so the bug could be fixed, so
your counter-argument fails ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
