> >>> Reply on 13-11-2006 15:43:42 <<<> Basil Chupin wrote:
> > >
> >
> > One thing a lot of people are forgetting, is there's still OpenSUSE,
> > which contributes no money whatsoever to MS and isn't likely to
> > receiveany MS patents.
> >
> 
> c'mon.. in all reports is written that the agreement assures that no
> USER will get sued my Microsoft. But I've never, really NEVER and
> NOWHERE read that MS would not sue Novell if they were infringing their
> patents. Why was this not put in the contract? Microsoft does not grant
> the usage of their patented work by Novell (there is NO Patent license
> fee) nor does Novell believe that they infringe any of the MS Patents.
> So there was basically no need/wish for such a clause

IMO, OpenSUSE, absent any statement of ownership or independence to the 
contrary, is a wholly owned entity on the books of Novell along with Ximian and 
its other acquisitions.  We can all be sure that Microsoft cannot be trusted 
and will usually do an end run around anything not in its interests and even in 
the agreements with Novell, it retained the right to change its pledges.  As 
far as Microsoft suing single end users, I don't know of them doing that but it 
is known they have no qualms about going after small businesses for violating 
their EULA's and agreements. Novell is not squeaky clean either.  Novell's 
legal department is very focused on protecting their IP and litigating against 
the piracy of any Novell product in any form, specifically software, 
electronic, and printed.  I am also aware of technology that Novell has buried 
that was not in their interest (technically probably infringing before 
acquisition).  One example is a German (I believe) company that had developed a 
very good Novell Client for authenticating to Novell from Linux; Right after it 
was seen in Brainshare session, it was said that Novell bought the company and 
then buried the technology.  It was so well buried as I could not find it 
available anywhere. Only recently has Novell made a Novell client available on 
openSuSE 10.1.  Also, Novell does a very good job of providing a great Linux 
desktop experience at Brainshare on their network including authentication, 
Novell connectivity, iPrint, groupwise, etc.;  I have yet to see how they do 
that or what technology they are using "under the covers" to provide that 
experience, something they seem to be keeping to themselves and their partners 
as protected IP.  I have been a long supporter of SuSE since about 6.0 and had 
bought every version including 10.0 of SuSE Professional (until they dropped 
the Professional).  I am coming to the conclusion that it is no longer in my 
interest to run openSUSE because of this agreement between Microsoft and Novell 
and given that openSUSE is a wholly owned and funded by Novell.  Novell could 
actually shut the doors on openSUSE if it found it in its interest to do so 
since it owns it and in one fell swoop, disenfrancise its users.  It is 
probably time to say goodbye to openSuSE as well.  Maybe if enough people do 
this, Novell will get the message that agreement is not in their interest or in 
the best interest of the Linux community.

Clint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to