>>> Reply on 29-11-2006 11:12:55 <<<

> Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> > Yes, that's a sad story. SLOX (SuSE Linux OpenXchange) was very
> > promising. When SuSE got bought by Novell, there were far to many
> > Messaging services around (netmail, groupwise, slox), so slox had
to
> go
> > away.
> > 
> > Hula is, let's say, I child under the projects and when I looked
at
> it,
> > was not very evolved. I don't know how much changed in this time.
But
> > when comparing Hula and OpenXchange with Zimbra [1] for example,
you
> > probably see why they disappear and don't get that much attention
> > anymore.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Dominique
> > 
> > [1]http://www.zimbra.com/ (online demo also available)
> 
> Not really. Being someone who has to use Zimbra (just for IMAP at
the
> moment) I can say that you don't want to use Zimbra as IMAP service.
> I haven't analyzed it yet but it seems that it only allows one open
> IMAP
> session per user. That means that folder switching takes ages.
> It doesn't support ACLs for IMAP and it doesn't support IMAP IDLE as
it
> seems.
> 

Wolfgang,

Thanks for this information :-) At the moment, I was just looking
around and zimbra looked very promising. At this time, I'm just using
horde/imp, which is nice.. but lacks some features and usability.

Is your Zimbra configured to use a 3rd party IMAP or is it using the
one shipped with Zimbra?

So.. if you were me, that would have to decide what System to choose,
(for private purpose, so it has to be free) for let's say, 10 accounts
(unlimited size)... what would you suggest?

Dominique
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to