On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 01:28:36 -0900, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took time to say the following:
(^_^)On Monday 05 February 2007, Rajko M. wrote: (^_^)> In this respect bugzilla is much more restrictive. The name of bug reporter is (^_^)> visible only to logged in users, not to search engines. (^_^) (^_^)Well that's have the problem isn't it! (^_^) (^_^)Why should one have to know about and log into specific (^_^)servers to find out about bugs. Google does this so much (^_^)better. (^_^) (^_^)If this list can obfuscate email addresses in the archives (^_^)why can't bugzilla? (^_^) (^_^)-- (^_^)_____________________________________ (^_^)John Andersen Have to ask ask the question that is begging to be asked. :-) Why not just get/use a service like hotmail/yahoo/gmail then? Although it is still possible to find out where the message came from and so forth. <shrug> Don't even have to use your real name. There really isn't no such thing as being unknown and so forth on the internet. Contrary to popular belief. Too many people spend money they haven't earned to buy things they don't want, to impress people they don't like. -Will Rogers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
