>>> On 07-02-2007 at 11:45, Philipp Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:31:32 -0600, Darryl Gregorash wrote: > >>However, too often does a bug get marked as a duplicate of a bug that is >>restricted to Novell employees and enterprise customers, even when it is >>present in versions 9.3 through 10.2. > > Yes, this is bothersome and should IMHO be changed, even if that means > that developers would have to keep parallel bugs, one open and one > not.
That can not be a real suggestion now.. I don't believe you're serious in this. If a DEV has to start to work on twice the same bug, and administering all this work.. will he ever have time to fix bugs? I had very good experience with BugZilla.. whenever I hit a bug that's closed because it was initially opened for a EnterPrise product, I drop the dev a message... most of the time the referred one get's opened very quick afterwards... Maybe a solution would be to have BugZilla itself check if the linked BugZilla entry is available and give a report to Admins as soon as a linked one would point to a closed ( non public) bug report. For sure we should NOT put more work on the DEVs... keep them doing what they can do bets: fixing (and introducing new) bugs :-0 Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
