Dňa Ut 13. Február 2007 17:22 jdd napísal: > Stanislav Visnovsky wrote: > > Dňa Po 12. Február 2007 09:37 jdd napísal: > >> Rajko M. wrote: > >>> the rest of the thread make clear that inexperience played a role in > >>> the problems. > >> > >> there is lessons on all the problems. may be YaST should better look > >> at the installed repositories to avoid duplicates and inconsistency > >> (or at least give strong warnings). > > > > What are you expectations here? > > two different things: > > one > > yast shouldn't accept (without warning) two duplicate source (two > sources of the same index? or same final name?) as they may be not in > sync. > > in other worlds, there should not be two theorically indentical > mirrors in the list
That would assume there is a detection that the repos are in fact the same. I don't think this is realistic - this would mean a globally unique identification of a repository. A checksum might work out, or not. Also, I believe you want this to apply for online repos only, correct? > > second > > the update directory is directly related to one source directory and > should be bind to him, why not setup in one movement (adding source > add also update), at least for the official repository I think it is more that an update repository is bound to a product installed. Stano -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
