John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Friday 16 February 2007, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > C) That the current mechanism hides the complexity of the process from
>> > the user  not providing good feedback as to what is happening.    Maybe 
>> > this is ok, but when things go wrong most people don't know what to do.
>
>> Do you have an example?
>
> What color is the sky on your planet Andreas?

The original message was so foggy that I needed at least one ;-)

> This list has been full of such examples.
>
> Virtually any time zen-updater coughs up an error and can not complete
> the process most users are in trouble and have to start searching for
> solutions, either on this list or via google. 
>
> Just go to the archives and search on "updater" only in the english
> list and only in the last 3 months.  You will have plenty of reading.
>
> For a specific example of such a situation, considder:
>
> Who wrote the dreaded error message:
>    "Resolvable id xxxxxx does not exist."
> That man needs a trip to the wood-shed.  (It had to be a man, no female
> programmer would be so arrogant or dumb as to leave no clue, and no way to 
> find a clue about what package required xxxxxx or how to fix the problem).

Thanks, now I understand what is meant - and agree,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
   Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgpjvdaGWhAlR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to