Carlos E. R. wrote: > So we had: > > Received: from lists4.suse.de (lists4.suse.de [195.135.221.135]) > by mailin.webmailer.de (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l01C0UMi005945 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:00:31 +0100 (MET) > > > So mail arrived at the box on January, but he fetched it Yesterday: > > > Received: from post.strato.de [192.67.198.2] > by dothangizmo.gk.lan with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.2) > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (single-drop); Sat, 03 Mar 2007 01:42:57 > +0100 (CET)
I guess he is one of those guys that like to forward mails back and forth, and he kind of forgot to poll that account as well, until he had a backlog of thousands of mails. > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (expanded from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>): host > mailin.rzone.de[81.169.145.100] said: 550 5.0.0 Dial-Up IP address > rejected > (in reply to RCPT TO command) > > > Maybe his postfix tried to send to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", instead of > taking it locally, as was intended. He is "growngizmo.de" (I think), but > his mail is handled by mailin.rzone.de, which refused his client being > dynamic... so finally, postfix, not knowing how to send to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" bounces back to us. > > Does it sound reasonable? That could be, though the real question is why anything he polled with fetchmail was bouncing back at all. I don't like fetchmail and don't use it, but AFAIK you can set it up not to bounce anything and instead redirect it to a postmaster account. -- Sandy List replies only please! Please address PMs to: news-reply2 (@) japantest (.) homelinux (.) com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
