On Monday 16 April 2007 16:28, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > So I was a bit surprised to find that the "--show" output was
> > inaccurate on both my 10.0 and 10.2 systems. In both cases, it said
> > the framebuffer dimensions were 1280x1024 when in fact in both cases
> > the true pixel dimensions were 1600x1200.
>
> also on my 10.1 system, shows 1280x1024 but is 1600x1200.
I have a question for yous guys... are your systems setup for virtual
displays (what I call virtual display--- the mouse moves a 1024x768 window
over a 1600x1200 virtual space)? Or, are your displays actually 1600x1200?
I have another question for Randall too, if you got the time, is the
frame
buffer command working differently depending on whether it is run from within
a terminal emulator (konsole) vs a tty console (alt-F1 black screen)? Does
it require a different frame buffer device for each console? X system?
Thanks.
--
Kind regards,
M Harris <><
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
