* M Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-16-07 17:49]: > On Monday 16 April 2007 16:28, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > > So I was a bit surprised to find that the "--show" output was > > > inaccurate on both my 10.0 and 10.2 systems. In both cases, it said > > > the framebuffer dimensions were 1280x1024 when in fact in both cases > > > the true pixel dimensions were 1600x1200. > > > > also on my 10.1 system, shows 1280x1024 but is 1600x1200. > I have a question for yous guys... are your systems setup for virtual > displays (what I call virtual display--- the mouse moves a 1024x768 window > over a 1600x1200 virtual space)? Or, are your displays actually 1600x1200?
actually 1600x1200 > I have another question for Randall too, if you got the time, is the > frame > buffer command working differently depending on whether it is run from within > a terminal emulator (konsole) vs a tty console (alt-F1 black screen)? Does > it require a different frame buffer device for each console? X system? I see the same output in the pts/5 term emulator as in the tty2 console, not presupposing Randall's response -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
