Jerry Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:27:52 -0500
> SOTL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Every now and then something is posted that is a must read for ALL computer
>> programmers.
>>
>> In the SCO vs IBM case IBM IBM has posted such a document as Amendment A.
>>
>> http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-1034ExA.pdf
>>
>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070425224227125
>>
> I read Groklaw every day, partially because the outcome could have a
> huge affect on both Linux and the entire OpenSource community. At the
> moment, I think last Friday's 3 declarations by Novell (Tor Braham who
> was the outside attorney who drafted the Novell-Santa Cruz APA, Allison
> Amadia, outside attorney who drafted Amendment 2, and David Bradford,
> Novell Senior Vice-president, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary).
> The issue that is discussed is whether Novell sold the Unix and
> Unixware copyrights and patents to Santa Cruz. All 3 state, with
> associated documents, that Novell did not and never intended to sell the
> copyrights and patents to Santa Cruz.
> But, not only as a computer programmer as well as a person that runs a
> number of listservs, I am well aware of copyright issues. One time, at
> Digital, we were instructed to remove IBM copyrights from header files
> and code (OSF). This was legal because IBM had transferred the rights
> to OSF members.
>
>
Hold on, are you saying SCO still has a case? I thought the judge
pretty much blasted it completely out of the water.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
