--- John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Mike McMullin wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:49 -0800, John Andersen > wrote: > > > On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > > > > Much posturing, but Balmer is still > > > > > claiming Linux violates MS IP
> http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2006/11/microsoft_claim.html > http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS7228555922.html > http://www.forbes.com/home/enterprisetech/2006/03/22/ballmer-microsoft-linux-cz_df_0322microsoft.html > http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/17/1324248 > http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/108806.asp?source=rss > http://www.themoneytimes.com/articles/20061121/novell_rejects_microsofts_ip_claims-id-102189.html > http://www.itworldcanada.com//Pages/Docbase/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=idgml-845c571e-47c3-40af-93c5-d1b2cc308cd7 > http://dotnet.sys-con.com/read/308332.htm > I find it interesting that Mr Hovsepian seems to > know all about this issue > and is worried about it enough to address it on > Novell's web site, but > yet Mr Meissner remains ignorant of the issue. > > Head in sand Marcus? > > -- > _____________________________________ > John Andersen You used the word "still" as in ongoing. These are all from last year. If you have nothing newer to cite, your claim is false. More accurately; In the past, Mr. Ballmer made spurious charges about MS IP in Linux, which Mr. Hovsepian promptly refuted. Without the bullshit, that's the whole story. Not much to write about. Any elaboration beyond that, from any quarter, qualifies as FUD if not accompanied by credible evidence. You've presented none, beyond that event in November, 2006, which is summed up in the single sentence above. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
