On Saturday 12 May 2007, M Harris wrote: > On Friday 11 May 2007 23:27, M Harris wrote: > > If the file system has problems then every system would display > > symptoms of those problems... under conditions that are (software > > remember) repeatable... reproduceable... and most importantly, fixable. > > Where are the bug reports... ? How come those "bugs" are not affecting > > my systems? > > ... and these are some interesting benchmarks for Reiser4 > > > http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html
Man. When you go off you REALLY GO OFF! There is no need to be rude. I do not religiously believe in EXF3 over ReiserFS. Frankly I do not care as long as it works. I simply have better experience with EXF3 then ReiserFS. And I have read many articles on the subject and was impressed with the results.....until I had problems. I was using both in my classes (I taught Linux for three years) and EXF3 simply gave me longer mileage. If I could compare that experience with anything then I would probably mention my experience with MAXTOR drives (or superdrives). They were supposed to be superior,best, fastest and all that advertising rubbish. I can tell you that after burning several of them I have replaced my last Maxtor drive a couple of weeks ago and there is no Maxtor for me ever. This can be just my personal experience but it does not change my opinion. > > > > > > -- > Kind regards, > > M Harris <>< -- Regards, George Osvald OK Studio ® http://www.okstudio.com.au Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
