On Sunday 13 May 2007, Vince L wrote: > I seem to remember reading something either by him or > quoting him, which iirc in essence said that none of the distros people > understood reiserfs properly, that suse's changes were wrong, and even his > developers don't fully understand it.
Souce please... > Resiserfs is at a dead end, and with hindsight it could have > been seen to be a dead end way back. Ext2 and 3 are equally candidates for dead-end-ism. The only reason suse re-emphasized ext2/3 is because RedHat does all the maintenance for them. There are more than a few published benchmarks on this topic such as http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388/print But it seems pointless to re-start this discussion, especially in the light of comments like: "with hindsight it could have been seen to be a dead end way back" -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgpqU8evxfmKA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
