-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Thursday 2007-05-31 at 09:21 -0600, Darryl Gregorash wrote:

> I do not even understand why syslogd is even still included in the
> distribution, unless it is for die-hard admins who think anything that
> can be understood by ordinary folk is evil :-)

Probably because syslogd is more tested and reliable. The ng one still has 
some bugs, and even missing features.

Even so, I prefer the ng one.

- -- 
Cheers,
       Carlos E. R.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFGX+VctTMYHG2NR9URAtzrAJ9KaIkIk4XeIHwPxxuxKZFztq8SfACfSNio
wtnnAGOhC3OTXwBdX0jbE4s=
=rcAQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to