El vie, 29-06-2007 a las 19:01 +0200, Anders Johansson escribió: > On Friday 29 June 2007 19:00:39 Hudibras wrote: > > Yes. I saw time ago a severe security fix for Postfix... qmail doesn't > > have ANY ONE. > > CAN-2005-1515
Then, he who did found the hole will be rewarded with the $1000 Dan Bernstein offered if someone would exploit qmail! I will find more discussion about this, even mailing to the same Dan Bernstein or Bill Shupp or Dave Sill. Even more, if this is true, can Sendmail or Postfix or any else be so proud of having one only security hole? It's seems to me unbelieveable that if another MTA have hundreds of holes, it doesn't mind: "It's a human product"; but if, in any other case, is referred to qmail, then qmail is not good. Well. > > > > > Sendmail had some problems with > > > security some years ago. In the last years I they tightened their code a > > > lot. Though I do remember that Sendmail had a remote exploitable bug last > > > year. > > > > Yes. Sendmail is already history... > > Sendmail is used bz considerably more, and considerably larger installations > than qmail. Yes. In 1929 considerably more people voted Hitler. > But let's stop the hearsay debate, OK? No. It's not a debate. I think it's a very good thing to discuss things, programs, servers here. I learn a lot! I read many many mails here I'm not agree with, but I do look up everyone, their taste, their opinions and their ideas. And why not if I advice qmail to a mailing list friend? Is it that a deadly sin? Why it's has to be anyone oppositing ideas and sometimes with not very friendly words? Cheers, Alejandro. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
