On Sunday 22 July 2007 14:35:07 Rajko M. wrote:
> On Saturday 21 July 2007 22:24, you wrote:
> ....
OK Rajko, I am going to trim this post quite a bit. All read over several 
times and thoroughly digested. I hope that won't mess you up. I will confine 
it to providing information and questions.

OK, ran   ls /sys/bus/i2c/devices/9191-0290 and the following was listed in 
that directory.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>  ls /sys/bus/i2c/devices/9191-0290
alarms           fan3_div            in2_max    in8_input    temp1_max_hyst
beep_enable fan3_input         in2_min      in8_max     temp1_type
beep_mask   fan3_min            in3_input   in8_min      temp2_input
bus               hwmon:hwmon0  in3_max    name         temp2_max
driver            in0_input            in3_min     power       temp2_max_hyst
fan1_div       in0_max             in4_input    pwm1         temp2_type
fan1_input    in0_min              in4_max     pwm2         temp3_input
fan1_min      in1_input            in4_min      pwm3         temp3_max
fan2_div       in1_max             in7_input   subsystem   temp3_max_hyst
fan2_input    in1_min              in7_max      temp1_input  temp3_type
fan2_min      in2_input            in7_min       temp1_max    uevent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>

As you can see....there is no vrm and I guess is not compiled in andsensors-s 
will never see it.

> In both cases it is easier to write sensors.conf from scratch than to
> correct driver source code.
>
> *********************************************************************
> Now back to proposal for sensors.conf:
>
> *** We have raw values ***


> *** We have default statements ***

> *** We have what BIOS tells ***

> *** We have your original posting ***

> *** We have standard voltages ***

> *** Missing ***
> We don't have sensors output with default values.

Not absolutely sure but I think my first posting was from the default values.

> ***
> Here is attempt to wite new config file with provided data.
> New section name, as you don't have the other chip:
> chip "w83627thf-*"
> # Voltage section
>     label in0 "VCore"
>       set in0_min 1.50     # below 1.5
>       set in0_max 1.56     # just in case that voltage goes up
>
>     label in1 "+3.3V"
>       set in1_min 3.14     # 3.3*0.95
>       set in1_max 3.47     # 3.3*1.05
>
>     label in3 "+5V"
>       compute in3 1.667*@, @/1.667  # ((34/51)+1)=1.667
>
>     ignore in2             # for now set to ignore 0.45V
>
>     label in4 "+12V"                # this usually +12 pin
>       compute in4 3.8*@, @/3.8      # ((28/10)+1)=3.8
>       set in4_min 11.40
>       set in4_max 12.60
>
>     ignore in5
>     ignore in6
>     ignore in7
>
> # Fan section
>
>     label fan1 "Sys Fan"
>     label fan2 "CPU Fan"
>     ignore fan3
>
> # Temperature section
>
>     set sensor1 3435  # see [1]
>     label temp1 "CPU Temp"
> #    set temp1_over ??  # see [2]
> #    set temp1_hyst ??  # see [2]
>
>     set sensor2 3435  # see [1]
>     label temp2 "M/B Temp"
> #    set temp2_over ??  # see [2]
> #    set temp2_hyst ??  # see [2]
>
>     ignore temp3
>
> *********************************************************************

OK I cut and pasted your suggested/trial parameters into the one line 
sensors.conf and ran sensors -s. (as root) Got another error:

EasyStreet:/ # sensors -s
Error: Line 4: Invalid keyword
General parse error

I looked at until my eyes glazed over. I can't see it.

Here are the first few lines from your suggested conf that reportedly contains 
the error:

chip "w83627thf-*" 
# Voltage section    
    label in0 "VCore"
      set in0_min 1.50     # below 1.5  
      set in0_max 1.56     # just in case that voltage goes up

    label in1 "+3.3V"
      set in1_min 3.14     # 3.3*0.95
      set in1_max 3.47     # 3.3*1.05

> [1] In todays computers it is probably thermistor and temperature value
> will be different than for diode. The only difference can be thermistor
> Beta value. The 3435 is from examples sensors, but values can be changed to
> get same reading as BIOS:
>     CPU       55 degrees C
>     Sys Tmp   45 degrees C
> I guess that when you change sensor type to thermistor it will show proper
> CPU temperature. If
>   sensors -s
> reports "Unknown feature name" than something is wrong.
>
> [2] For temperature limits and hysteresis we need exac tCPU model and
> datasheet.

OK, we haven't got that far yet.

Thanks again

Bob S


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to