And that presumably means that SCO's claim that Linux infringes upon Unix (copy write) code is stone dead - simply because SCO does not own Unix.
As I see it, the issue of copy write infringement per se remains moot, and the FOSS community can not yet let down its guard. Since Novell (owner of Unix) is not about to sue Novell (owner of SUSE) there is time for a breather. But what happens when someone comes along and buys out Novel, drops SUSE and starts the whole thing over again? It doesn't take much imagination to figure out who has the financial clout and the motivation for such a step. Incidentally, can SCO appeal that ruling? James Knott wrote: > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070810165237718 > >
begin:vcard fn:Daniel Feiglin n:Feiglin;Daniel adr:;;POB 36;Shavei Shomron;Doar Na;44858;ISRAEL email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:972 9 8616204 tel;fax:972 9 8621052 tel;pager:Skype user ID: baba_danny tel;home:972 9 8320939 tel;cell:927 52 3869986 version:2.1 end:vcard
